ExperimentControl/SRS: Difference between revisions

From air
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
==1.4 References==
==1.4 References==


execo's page : [http://execo.gforge.inria.fr/doc/latest-stable/ execo]
*execo's page : [http://execo.gforge.inria.fr/doc/latest-stable/ execo]


expo tool, that already support resource sets : [https://github.com/camilo1729/expo expo]
*expo tool, that already support resource sets : [https://github.com/camilo1729/expo expo]


Another experiment control tool : [http://xpflow.gforge.inria.fr/ XPFlow]
*Another experiment control tool : [http://xpflow.gforge.inria.fr/ XPFlow]


article on the subject : [https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01087519 A survey of general-purpose experiment management tools for distributed systems ]
*article on the subject : [https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01087519 A survey of general-purpose experiment management tools for distributed systems ]


==1.5 Overview of the remainder of the document==
==1.5 Overview of the remainder of the document==

Revision as of 21:40, 5 February 2017

Document History
Version Date Authors Description Validator Validation Date
0.1.0 2017 Lemaire Timothée - Homberg Nicolas TBC TBC TBC


1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose of the requirements document

This document's aim is to explain the requirement of the execo system

1.2 Scope of the product

The scope of the product is to improve the library execo by adding :

  • a notion of session.
  • interaction with a REST API
  • support of the group of ressources


1.3 Definitions, acronyms and abbreviations

1.4 References

  • expo tool, that already support resource sets : expo
  • Another experiment control tool : XPFlow

1.5 Overview of the remainder of the document

2. General description

2.1 Product perspective

2.2 Product functions

2.3 User characteristics

2.4 General constraints

2.5 Assumptions and dependencies

3.Specific requirements, covering functional, non-functional and interface requirements

  • document external interfaces,
  • describe system functionality and performance
  • specify logical database requirements,
  • design constraints,
  • emergent system properties and quality characteristics.

3.1 Requirement X.Y.Z (in Structured Natural Language)

Function:

Description:

Inputs:

Source:

Outputs:

Destination:

Action:

  • Natural language sentences (with MUST, MAY, SHALL)
  • Graphical Notations : UML Sequence w/o collaboration diagrams, Process maps, Task Analysis (HTA, CTT)
  • Mathematical Notations
  • Tabular notations for several (condition --> action) tuples

Non functional requirements:

Pre-condition:

Post-condition:

Side-effects:

4. Product evolution

5. Appendices

6. Index